• About
    ▼
    • Our History
    • Our Facility
    • Satisfaction Guaranteed
    • Blog
  • Services
    ▼
    • HK Conversions
    • Custom Builds
    • Gunsmithing Services
      ▼
      • Engraving
      • Refinishing
  • Pricing
    ▼
    • MP5 Conversions
    • MP5-N Conversions
    • G3 Conversions
    • 33/53 Conversions
    • Gunsmithing Services
    • Transfers
  • Ordering
    ▼
    • Service Request Form
    • Shipping
    • Transfers
      ▼
      • Transfer Policies
      • Incoming Transfer Procedure
      • Outgoing Transfer Procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Gallery
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Contact Us
    • Location

Bahnhof Machine

Your HK Conversion Specialists.

Your HK Conversion Specialists.
  • About
    • Our History
    • Our Facility
    • Satisfaction Guaranteed
    • Blog
  • Services
    • HK Conversions
    • Custom Builds
    • Gunsmithing Services
      • Engraving
      • Refinishing
  • Pricing
    • MP5 Conversions
    • MP5-N Conversions
    • G3 Conversions
    • 33/53 Conversions
    • Gunsmithing Services
    • Transfers
  • Ordering
    • Service Request Form
    • Shipping
    • Transfers
      • Transfer Policies
      • Incoming Transfer Procedure
      • Outgoing Transfer Procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Gallery
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Location

Silencer Tax: The Cost of Getting rid of the $200 Stamp

July 30, 2018 by Brad Bonhoff

Various incarnations of the Hearing Protection Act and the SHARE Act are churning their way through the legislative sausage grinder and onto social media feeds. In the midst of what is almost unanimously viewed as an opportunity for a positive change in deregulation, some comments of dismay and surprise seem to be popping up. People are reading the bill and discovering that the NFA $200 tax might be replaced by a 10% excise tax — and “that’s how they’ll screw ya!” The discovery of the 1937 Pittman–Robertson (PR) Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act (WR) is apparently both new and alarming to some folks, even though they’ve been a participant in it with every round of ammunition and firearm they’ve ever owned.

A little history of the PR Wildlife Act and explanation of how it works might be in order to make a qualified decision on whether this is good news or bad.

In the 1930’s, President Roosevelt handed our great-grandparents a “New Deal,” which was a huge wealth redistribution scheme aimed at fending off the economic depression that started in 1929. Unemployment was at 25%. U.S. manufacturing output dropped over 30%. Money value deflated. So the Progressive answer was, of course, to put higher taxes on more things. Under the stresses of the depression, the “temporary” Revenue Act of 1932 began taxing a long list of commodities and services. It was supposed to sunset on June 30, 1934. The category of firearms and ammunition got tagged with a 10% excise tax, payable by the manufacturer on the wholesale value. This money went into the general funds of the federal government to be spent wherever the Roosevelt Brain Trust felt it was best suited to help promote the “3 Rs” of Relief, Recovery, and Reform.

Parallel but separate to the economic Depression, an awareness of nature conservation was growing. And not necessarily in the hippy, anti-hunting way, some might associate today. These were sportsmen that realized that *maybe* — just maybe — killing off ALL the bison wasn’t the best idea. Game animals we think of as commonplace, such as whitetail deer, were becoming scarce. Wild turkey sightings were a tall tale. Passenger pigeons were hunted into extinction. Economically speaking, firearm and ammunition companies knew that if the USA ran out of delicious targets, they wouldn’t be selling much of anything in the future. Which, in the end, would dramatically affect gun ownership and usage for generations to come.

When Congress was discussing discontinuing this tax in 1937, conservationists requested it be repackaged and earmarked for wildlife restoration. Senator Key Pittman and Representative A. Willis Robertson sponsored a bill to collect an excise tax on guns and ammunition and force the funds towards pro-hunting and wildlife causes. It passed with little opposition. And whether you know it or not, you’ve been paying into that fund with every piece of lead you’ve returned to the earth since then.

NOT THE WORST TAX YOU’VE EVER PAID

While no one likes a new tax, this one at least escapes a lot of the government good-idea-fairy’s grasp. On top of that, it’s pretty widely accepted as one of the few taxes that positively affects the people being taxed. Also -shockingly for any tax- it has a positive rate of return to companies paying into it. The PR’s sneaky play was the inclusion of wording that prohibits the diversion of fees paid by hunters for any other purpose than the administration of game and fish departments. States have to agree to this provision to receive their chunk of PR funds. As the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service explains, these funds go to the Secretary of the Interior and on to the States for “acquisition and improvement of wildlife habitat, introduction of wildlife into suitable habitat, research into wildlife problems, surveys and inventories of wildlife problems, acquisition and development of access facilities for public use, and hunter education programs, including construction and operation of public target ranges.”

While most people are unaware of PR and how it works, one anti-gun website discovered it and wrote a scathing condemnation of the entire evil scheme, uncovering that “Game agencies encourage very young children to hunt. They want to ensure the future of hunting and firearms profits!” Hmm. That doesn’t sound too bad to me. Public target ranges and youth gun safety programs paid for with your ammo tax dollars is policy guaranteed to make anti-gunners cringe. And the fact that your AR15 purchase preserves “their” nature parks is worth reminding them about. Frequently.

Over the last 80 years, hunting license and firearm tax dollars have been protected from being skimmed off by state governments for other purposes due to PR language. Along the way, amendments starting in the 1970s generally continued in manners supportive of hunters and gun owners. One example would be Rep. Latta of Ohio’s amendment, which added on the awesomely-named “Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act.” This authorized a state to pay up to 90% of the costs of acquiring land for, expanding, or constructing public target ranges. Excise tax on bows and arrows were eventually folded in to contribute to PR funds, and a similar fishing tax/protection act exists to benefit our perch-pursuing sportsman brothers.

As hinted at above, studies show that the excise tax has a positive effect on gun and accessory sales. If there’s a new public shooting range, people are going to go shooting and buy ammo. If there’s a new hunting ground stocked with game, some new shotguns are going across the counter of your local gun shop. From creating jobs in the guide business to sales of each round of ammunition, the PR results in opportunities for the firearms industry to make money. “How many tax models in our country today can show an $11 to $21 return to the company on every dollar spent,” said Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus Co-Chair U.S. Congressman Jeff Miller, R-Fla. “This is one of the most impressive examples of how an American industry can profit and bolster the economy while restoring and improving our nation’s cherished natural resources.”

All in all, PR taxes have been somewhat invisible to the end user because of their collection at the wholesale level. However, their collection has contributed around $11 billion ($787.5 million in the fiscal year 2016 alone) towards things the firearms community generally agrees on as good. The PR even benefits folks that don’t chip in: over 70% to 95% of citizens enjoying these funded areas are not even shooters, fishers, or hunters. They just camp, hike, and explore these same managed lands and admire or photograph their managed wildlife.

WHERE WERE WE? SOMETHING ABOUT SILENCERS?

After all the tree hugging, deer petting, and New Deal history, it comes back around to death and taxes. In this case, the death of one of the most onerous taxes of the 1930s: The National Firearms Act. The saddling of Maxim’s little harmless dime store tube with a big killer $200 federal stamp. The HPA aims to take sound suppressors off the NFA and lump it in with common Title One firearms such as rifles. The death of the silencer’s NFA tax would be great news if it passes: No more $200 end-user tax every time one changes hands. But, in the politics of give and take, it becomes taxed like a pistol with the same excise tax you’ve always paid whether you knew it or not. The SHARE Act’s language of Section EC. 1507 amends the Internal Revenue Code by adding “firearm silencer or firearm mufflers” to the list of “Articles taxable at 10 percent.”

HOW MUCH IS THIS GONNA COST ME?

People who don’t understand PR’s wholesale taxation arrangement are worried that a $1000 silencer would now have $100 due tax on it that wasn’t due before. Even though that would be half of what they pay now on an NFA stamp, it’s still not so. While wholesale-to-retail markup can vary wildly from maker to maker, let’s make some educated assumptions on the pricing of the common .22LR silencer. It might have an MSRP of $350, a dealer cost of $225, and a distributor cost of $175, if the manufacturer chooses to participate in two-step distribution. The first sale ($175) is the number that is taxed, and at 10%, that’s $17.50. And, yes, that’s $17 bucks which assuredly will be passed along to the consumer, but first folded through the dealer and distributor on its way, where it might get rounded up or down a bit. That sort of taxation on sound abatement might still be theft, but most folks should be less offended by having $17.50 pickpocketed towards a good cause than having $200 pinched just to participate in an annoyingly long waiting period.

Keep in mind that a PR type tax is paid one time only. Whereas each time an NFA item changes hands, another $200 transfer tax is due (which pretty much prevents a widespread used suppressor market). End users would not be taxed on downstream transfers as they are now. This would create, for the first time since 1934, a valid secondhand market as well as the potential for manufacturer trade-in deals on old suppressors. Additionally, we know that deregulation, of course, will also allow the market to grow. Through this, we can expect to see some cheaper silencers very quickly due to the scale of economy change in manufacturing them. This will further cut down the tax basis of a wholesale suppressor and therefore the total price to the end user. In short, there are exponential positive consequences to the consumer whether they’re hunters or just shooters that don’t want to ruin their hearing. Add to that the positive consequences of increased PR funding going to hunting areas and public lands, and you’ve got a better deal than you have now — by far.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Kel Whelan is an independent consultant to industry and government on silencer business and technology with more than 20 years of experience in manufacturing, design, sales, distribution, branding, and politics throughout the NFA industry. By way of disclosure, he owned, managed, and sold a silencer company and was one of the three founding directors of the ASA.

Read more: http://www.recoilweb.com/excise-tax-versus-nfa-tax-stamp-129705.html#ixzz5Mn798Zjt

Source: http://bit.ly/2M3hbO4

Filed Under: General, News, Products

Gun Collections Pose Special Estate Problems

August 19, 2016 by Brad Bonhoff

The following article is by Peter J. Reilly, a Forbes Contributor
Taxes are a heavy component of estate planning, but it is important to be alert for other issues.  Even though much of my practice is in a right-to-carry state (Florida), it hadn’t ever crossed my mind that guns require special attention in estate plans until I received a heads up from Allen J. Margulis of Total Counsel Law Group.  I asked Attorney Margulis if he would like to do a guest post on the subject of gun trusts and he was gracious enough to provide the following:

People may collect guns for self‐defense, target shooting or hunting. Guns may be investments or heirlooms. Many gun owners want their guns to be used responsibly and be passed on to those who appreciate them. Certain firearms and accessories are federally restricted. A state may restrict them further. For example, short‐barreled rifles, automatic weapons, silencers and other such items, require a federal tax stamp to acquire as well as the approval of the local Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO.) There are many regulations and issues surrounding passing guns down to one’s heirs that are not present with a bank account, chair, picture or other type of property. We must consider not only where the beneficiary lives, the laws of that state, the laws of the state where the items are located, the eligibility of the beneficiary to be in possession, but also:

  1. Is it a good idea to put a weapon in the hands of the beneficiary? Are they mature and responsible enough?
  2. If not, what will we do?

A Gun Trust is a special purpose revocable living trust. A Gun Trust is written to hold only firearms. The owner of the gun is the trustee and the beneficiary. The owner appoints successor trustees and lifetime and remainder beneficiaries. The trust can be amended or revoked at any time and the owner can name and remove beneficiaries. In the past, Gun Trusts were created primarily for NFA restricted firearms (Title II items ‐ silencers, short-barreled rifles, shotguns, and machine guns) but lately they have attracted the attention of those who own “assault weapons” .

Gun Trusts are used for two main reasons. The first is to expedite a transfer of a National Firearms Act firearm. Using a trust means you do not have to obtain the approval of your local Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) and the application can be sent directly to BATF. This saves a lot of time. Registration of a NFA firearm to an individual or corporation takes approximately one to three months to complete. The firearm cannot be handled or transported by any other private individual unless the firearm’s registered owner is present. However, NFA items owned by properly drafted trusts may be legally possessed by any Trustee and a beneficiary may use the item in the presence or under the authority of the Trustee. The second reason is to provide detailed instructions over disposition of one’s gun collection.

read more/source: http://bit.ly/2b3vftJ

Filed Under: News Tagged With: estate, nfa, trust

12 Firearm Instagram Accounts You Should Follow

August 18, 2016 by Brad Bonhoff

firearmsinstamainInstagram might be my favorite social media platform. Users can instantly capture and share their favorite photos, advertise products and events, and even post their best #shelfie (not to be confused with #selfie). On Instagram, the average joe turns into a professional photographer thanks to the app’s many filters and simple editing tools.

Below are a few of the accounts I found trolling through Instagram hashtags #EDC, #CCW, #Firearms, #2A…. you know the drill. These accounts are popular for reviewing firearms, promoting concealed carry, sharing other’s awesome firearms pictures and videos, or all of the above.

Check them out and tell us what your favorite Instagram accounts are in the comments below!

  1. @everyday_tactical
  2. @hashtagtical
  3. @fourguysguns
  4. @gun
  5. @readygunner
  6. @gunsdaily
  7. @wise_men_company
  8. @canetuckeecarry
  9. @project_ronald
  10. @metalhead_1
  11. @gunfreaks
  12. @sootch_00

read more/source: http://bit.ly/2b4XaU5

 

Filed Under: News Tagged With: firearms, instagram, nra

Tim Kaine: Ban 15-Round ‘Clips,’ Hold Gun Dealers Liable for Misuse of Firearms

July 25, 2016 by Kelly Crossley

clinton_kaineOn July 22 Hillary Clinton announced Tim Kaine as her running mate. Kaine is a Democrat senator from Virginia who supports a ban on 15-round “clips” and “assault weapons,” and who wants to enact a law to hold gun dealers liable for the misuse of firearms.

During the June 26 airing of Meet the Press, Kaine told Chuck Todd that he voted for an “assault weapons” ban before and “would likely vote for it again.” But he stressed that he believes “limitations on the size of magazines and ammunition clips” is the first step to take.

Todd asked Kaine if he believes the sale of AR-15 rifles ought to be illegal, and Kaine offered no direct answer. Instead, he suggested the problem with banning certain rifles is that the ban can be circumvented. Kaine said:

On September 8, 2015, just two weeks after Vester Lee Flanagan used a legally purchased firearm to kill news reporter Alison Parker on air, Kaine put forward a bill to hold licensed gun dealers liable for the misuse of firearms. The bill was designed to “raise the bar” and require more “accountability” on the part of gun sellers. The Roanoke Times reported that Kaine’s bill “would make gun sellers criminally liable for a bad sale if they didn’t take reasonable, affirmative steps to determine the customer met federal criteria.”

Consider the scenario—Flanagan passed a federal background check for his gun. He passed the very same check that Hillary Clinton, Gabby Giffords, and others assure us will reduce crime and/or make us safer. But after passing the check and acquiring the gun, Flanagan carried out an evil deed. Background checks will never stop a latent criminal from getting a gun; they only stop actual criminals.

Yet, even though the law was followed regarding Flanagan—a federal background check completed and passed—Kaine’s response was to push for more liability on the licensed gun dealer. In other words, he wants the gun dealer held responsible for what a buyer does after exiting the store with a firearm the FBI allowed him to purchase.

This is Hillary Clinton’s running mate.

read more/source: http://bit.ly/2aov5fP

Filed Under: News Tagged With: assault weapons, tim kaine

Chris W. Cox Delivers the Straight Truth on Hillary Clinton and the Second Amendment

July 25, 2016 by Kelly Crossley

chris-cox-rncOn Tuesday, NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox addressed the Republican National Convention about the grave threat to the Second Amendment posed by a Hillary Clinton presidency. On Wednesday, Clinton’s attack dogs were out in force, desperately trying to discredit the case Mr. Cox methodically built against her.

But Clinton’s campaign knows that the truth is to her presidential aspirations like oil is to water. Clinton’s political apparatus is therefore largely devoted to obscuring her record, her views, and her true agenda. No wonder recent polls have revealed that 2 out of 3 Americans find Clinton neither honest nor trustworthy.

And so it comes as no surprise that as Clinton pivots away from the primaries to a national campaign to bamboozle the broader American public, her apologists and spin-doctors are furiously downplaying Clinton’s extreme views on gun control. One website – ironically called Correct the Record, claimed that Clinton’s threat to the Second Amendment is “a lie that Republicans love” and one that has been “completely debunked.”

But Chris Cox could not have said it more clearly or accurately: Your continued right to protect yourself and your family with a firearm in your own home is on the ballot in November.

As Mr. Cox indicated, the Supreme Court ruled by a 5-4 margin in 2008’s landmark Heller case that the Second Amendment does indeed protect an individual’s right to keep and bear firearms for self-defense.

But Justice Scalia, the author of that opinion and the Second Amendment’s strongest voice on the Court, is now deceased. His replacement has yet to be confirmed. That leaves the U.S. Supreme Court at best evenly split on the Second Amendment’s individual right (two justices in the Heller minority have since retired, but their Obama-nominated replacements have already voted against the Second Amendment and/or to expand federal gun control).

And no matter what Hillary Clinton’s surrogates now claim, Hillary’s own view of Heller came straight out of her own mouth while she was talking to the one group of people she lies to the least: her upper-class donors. As leaked audio later revealed, Clinton told the audience at a private fundraiser in New York last October that “the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment. And I’m going to make that case every chance I get.”

read more/source: http://bit.ly/2aq92lr

Filed Under: News Tagged With: 2nd amendment, gun control, hillary clinton

CONNECT WITH US

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Famous Gun Quotes


Recent Blog Posts

  • Silencer Tax: The Cost of Getting rid of the $200 Stamp
  • Investing in Machine Guns?
  • Gun Collections Pose Special Estate Problems
  • 12 Firearm Instagram Accounts You Should Follow

Popular Blog Tags

2nd amendment assault weapons estate firearms gun control hillary clinton instagram machine guns nfa nra tim kaine trust

About Us

Bahnhof Machine is a full-service and federally licensed firearms dealer located in Minneola, Florida, which is just 30 minutes from downtown Orlando. We specialize in HK conversions, but also do everything from simple repairs to custom builds.

Get Connected

For the latest news, including contests, special offers, new products, and events, be sure to check out our Facebook,  Instagram, and LinkedIn pages by clicking one of the icons below.

—Brad Bonhoff, President

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Contact Us

Bahnhof Machine
2301 Zaltana Circle
Minneola, FL 34715
352.901.1655 phone
[email protected]

Office Hours
M–F: 8:00am–5:00pm
Sat, Sun: By appointment only

© Copyright 2023   Bahnof Machine, LLC · All Rights Reserved · Designed by  Idea Lynx